Engineering teams have always balanced performance, cost, and timelines. That reality hasn’t changed. What has changed is where friction shows up inside engineering organizations—and how that differs by generation.

Data from the latest Engineering Insights Report highlights a clear pattern: while engineers broadly agree on the top challenges they face, Career Pros and Millennial/Gen Z engineers diverge sharply once you look past schedules and budgets.

The Top Engineering Challenges: Schedule and Budget Still Dominate

Across generations, the same two challenges rise to the top:

• Staying on schedule
  Career Pros: 53%
  Millennial/Gen Z: 41%
  
  
• Staying on budget
  Career Pros: 35%
  Millennial/Gen Z: 39%

These pressures are universal. Modern engineering work is complex, cross-functional, and tightly tied to business outcomes. Hitting timelines and controlling costs remains the baseline expectation for every team.

Where Engineering Challenges Begin to Diverge by Generation

After schedule and budget, priorities split.

For Career Pros, the next most pressing challenge is:

• Keeping current with the latest technology (31%)

Senior engineers are navigating an unprecedented pace of change: expanding toolchains, cloud integration, AI and ML adoption, cybersecurity requirements, and evolving standards. Many are responsible for final technical decisions, where the cost of being wrong is high.

Their challenge isn’t exposure to technology—it’s decision risk in a fast-moving landscape.

For Millennial and Gen Z engineers, the picture looks different:

• Engineering staff lacks needed skills (36%)

Younger engineers are generally comfortable with new tools and technologies. What slows them down is the surrounding system: skill gaps on teams, legacy platforms, outdated documentation, and limited institutional knowledge.

The constraint isn’t innovation. It’s execution inside aging structures.

The Engineering Skills Gap Is a Systems Problem

These generational differences aren’t philosophical. They’re structural.

Career Pros carry accountability for architectural choices and long-term outcomes. Millennial and Gen Z engineers carry the burden of making progress inside systems they didn’t design—often with incomplete documentation and understaffed teams.

Both groups are under pressure. They’re just feeling it in different places.

Why This Matters for Engineering Organizations and Vendors

Most engineering tools, platforms, and marketing efforts focus on today’s decision makers. That makes sense—but the data suggests a growing opportunity elsewhere.

Millennial and Gen Z engineers are:

• working through skills gaps now
• forming opinions about which tools actually reduce friction
• learning how real engineering organizations operate under constraint

They are also the next generation of technical decision makers.

Organizations that invest in better documentation, stronger enablement, and tools that reduce reliance on tribal knowledge aren’t just solving short-term productivity issues. They’re influencing how future engineering leaders evaluate vendors, platforms, and partners.

Designing for the Future Engineering Workforce

Staying on schedule and on budget will always define engineering success. But the ability to do so increasingly depends on how well organizations support multi-generational teams.

Bridging experience with adaptability isn’t a soft goal—it’s a competitive advantage. Teams that enable knowledge transfer, close skill gaps, and reduce friction across generations will move faster, make better decisions, and build more resilient systems.

The challenge isn’t choosing between today’s decision maker and tomorrow’s. It’s recognizing that both are shaping engineering outcomes right now.

Looking for more data on the differences between these generations? Check out our 9th annual Engineering Insights Report. 

‍